One of the things I never understand in these threads is what am I (are we) supposed to be doing in this strange area where we're not actively separating or reconciling after D-day?
Marriage can be what you both define it to be. If you are OK with your wife having a lover then fine, go ahead. There are numerous examples of people having all sorts of open or quiet arrangements for what they want and/or accept in a marriage. I have used this example and think it far enough in the past as well as vague enough to pass the site’s strict No Politics rule, but some of the older members here might remember the clips from the funeral procession of a French president where the wife and their sons walked behind the casket, and behind them his mistress and their daughter. No – it’s not the norm in France, but for that couple there seemed to be an acknowledgement of what was going on.
I think it’s very common that a spouse – maybe more so the wife – KNOWS that the other has a lover and either openly or indirectly accepts it. Like you pretend to believe the spouse who says they are visiting their aunt next weekend despite you knowing said aunt passed away last year, or who say they spent a Thursday evening at "the gym" or whatever. You could choose to ignore what might be going on at the next conference or business trip where he might be too. Not saying this flippantly, because a lot of people live that way.
Maybe something like that appeals to you? If so, don’t bother reading further.
If not, then you must contemplate how you intend to move on, and what moving on looks like.
That moving on can be divorce or it can be reconciliation. After all – the third option is the one I presented above, and if you are still reading you have refused that option.
It’s not necessarily a linear process, but possibly the absolute WORST outcome IMHO is stagnation, where you might remind you wife every now and then that you aren’t happy with the affair, or where you try to convince yourself that the moment jr leaves for college you plan to divorce or whatever, she tells you nothing is going on but refuses to cut off contact with OM. Maybe 2-3 years from now THIS affair is over (or it might even be over now), or you start feeling safe that it’s over. But you two never deal with the issues and simply learn to live with unhandled infidelity in your marriage.
So what should you be doing right now?
I think some hard evaluation of what you want and what you definitely don’t want, as well as what you can get and what you can’t get is in order, with the aim of reaching a conclusion of what your path forwards should be. Give yourself some time to go through that.
At some point – and I would guestimate this point was less than 6 months from d-day – you should have a clear picture of what you are being offered. Compare that to what you feel are your needs and requirements. If the offer falls short – your path out of infidelity is through divorce. If she offers something you can work with… you have a shot at reconciliation.
The BIG RISK and the trap I think way too many fall for (I venture 10% of those that post here eventually divorce, and 10% eventually reconcile. The remaining 80% fall into this trap…) is where you find a way to cohabit without dealing with the infidelity. It might be over, or it might not be over. But you find ways to cohabit, have occasional sex, behave like a normal family to everyone looking in, but the cause for the infidelity is still there, and the consequences are still there. Maybe you even subdue your emotions with reasoning such as you will divorce once the money is better, or when the youngest leaves for college, or whatever. But time after time we see that the deadline is pushed because people have gotten used to the misery they are in and find it more comforting than the possible (and inevitable) pain of the divorce process.
--
Finally: I have used this story to describe what your actions should be during the decision process several times in the past:
Imagine you had to go for some life-saving treatment at a distant city. The only way there is by train. You are told that the absolute last day you need this treatment is 30 days from now.
You let your wife know, and ask if she wants to come along with you. You explain why you need to make this trip, why it has to be by train and why this deadline is in place. She refuses to commit. You go online and reserve tickets for both of you. You let her know she’s welcome to come along. You rearrange your schedule, canceling all appointments and activities taking place AFTER you leave, and you might suggest to her that she do the same with joint commitments and/or rearrange them as going alone. You might even visit with close friends and let them know of the journey and when you inevitably leave.
Several times over the next 30 days you offer her to come along. Like when she asked you why the suitcase was out of the storage and in the bedroom you reminded her of the trio, and reiterated the offer that she could come along.
The day before you pack your suitcase. You might even throw some of her clothes into a suitcase in case she decides to tag along. You sit her down and ask again – do you want to come with me?
On the day of the journey she might drive you to the station. She follows you inside, all the way to the platform. Again – you show her the ticket you got for her and remind her that she can run to the car and get the suitcase you packed for her. She refuses. The doors close, but you call through the glass that she can still get on board. She refuses. The train starts pulling out of the station…
That’s your journey. You can give her chance after chance to set off on reconciliation with you. You might even adapt – like she wanted the brown suitcase and not the red one you got out of storage, she wanted first-class tickets and not standard, she wanted motion sickness medicine… whatever. But eventually YOU get on board the train that gets you out of infidelity – and if she’s not on board then the destination is divorce.
--
Finally: I’m having a hard time with her role in the company and the OM…
If he has all the patents the business is based on and can take them if removed from his role then what is the real value of the company?
What investor is willing to place money into a company that is totally dependent on ONE person? Like if I was contemplating putting money into that company – say a million dollars for 5% I could just as well offer the OM a job with a million signing-on fee. What assurances did investors get that the patents remain within the company? What are they really investing in?
Or if he is hit by a car? Or falls down a flight of stairs? Or get’s cancer? Investors OK with the patent being managed by his estate/inheritors or being in some limbo while that is all dealt with?
It’s too weak, and it’s a flag I would warn any potential investor about.
If the value is in the patents and they are his, then your wife has extremely limited value. No investor would put money into an idea based on a patent they don’t own simply because it’s fronted by someone they like. Excel doesn’t smile or look pretty…
Maybe OM knows this and this is why he’s fine with having your wife as a side-piece. That in turn indicates ethics that would make me – as an investor – be afraid for my money.